Alan McKinnon wrote: > I simply do now allow ReiserFS to be deployed, for a veriety of > reasons.Most important is that I have severe doubts about being able to get > the same level of support as for ext3.
One of the more annoying issues that ReiserFS has is that the »reiserfsck« program will mistake any block on the disk that looks like a valid ReiserFS superblock for the start of a new filesystem. This will bite you hard if you have files containing file system images, which is not unusual now that virtualisation is widespread. ReiserFS may have had its day but that's over (except for the shouting). I agree that we should remove it from the exams as soon as the default-ReiserFS distributions (SLES 10?) have EOL'd. Anselm (This is my personal opinion and not that of Linup Front GmbH.) -- Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany [email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
