Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> écrit : > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:49:17 +0100 > Marc Baudoin <mbaud...@linagora.com> wrote: > > > Topic 103 in exam 101 has those subtopics: > > > > 103.2: filters > > 103.4: redirections and pipes > > 103.5: processes > > 103.7: grep > > [...] > > > > A more logical approach would be: > > > > processes (or grep) > > grep (or processes) > > redirections and pipes > > filters > > It's always been my opinion that the section numbers are completely > arbitrary and should not be considered as a number sequence. Think of > them as fancy bullet points.
What's the point in having an order then (especially when it's numbered)? > The point is, you are perfectly free to teach and/or study the > materials in any order that makes sense for you. LPI does not dictate > exactly how the training will advance, only that a graduate should know > the subject matter of the topics once finished. And that's what I'm doing anyway. The problems I see is that trainees like (very much) to match what they're studying to the official objectives (which is perfectly legitimate) and it's much easier when the course and the training materials are in the same order than the objectives. Also, it's much easier to use different training materials and to grab information from them if they treat topics in the same order. In that, the official objectives should provide a logicial and progressive path for trainees and trainers (or so I believe). Anyway, I see everybody concurs objectives should be studied less randomly, I feel less alone today ;-) -- Marc Baudoin Linagora - responsable pédagogique http://www.linagora.com/-FORMATION- _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
