Hi, Am 28.02.2012 16:59, schrieb Anselm Lingnau:
> Contrary to what many people, including the authors of various LPI prep books, > seem to think, the order in which topics are listed in the objectives is *not* > actually the one single officially-allowed order in which these topics must > absolutely be taught. (The same applies to the objectives themselves.) > > Feel free to teach the material in whatever order you think is best, no matter > what the objectives say. Nobody will mind one way or the other. But why would we need to list them in a order that makes it harder to teach? Any good reason? If yes, we should stay with the actual order. But if there is no deeper reason behind the actual order: why not apply Marc Baudoins proposal? It hurts nobody, and helps some people. Ingo _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
