Driving the point home ...

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Alexandru Ionica <alexandru.ion...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I have even asked (live) Hans De Goede at a conference about this and he
> said that the video compression poses problems as they are working with
> video frames and it get's complicated (you can't do things like you do with
> solutions which sit on top of Xorg and give drawing instructions).
>

SPICE wasn't designed to do that.  We already have open source protocols
that do that.  Why would SPICE replicate this functionality that is
pre-existing in other protocols specific to platforms and instances?
 Again, just use those protocols instead.

Or better yet, in _your_ context of "everyone uses VMware" ...

  What "product" or "add-on" in VMware provides native X11 widgets?
  Oh, that's right, they don't do Linux VDI at all!

This is why you need to stop assume things.  You make an argument in a
context, and then turn around and drop the context.  Please stop!  It's
beyond just insulting my professional background and experience, which I
could care less about.

This is a professional organization focus on Linux training, open source
and open standards.

If you want to win the argument, fine, "you won the argument."  Let's move
on, regardless of the facts you want to ignore, and the fact that Red Hat
associates come from lots of different backgrounds, and still work on
non-Red Hat solutions.  We are a major catalyst for open source, regardless
of trademark.

I cannot believe who "anti" you are.

I said it privately, but now I'll say it publicly ... this is why Red Hat
associates are very inhibited from being involved with LPI publicly, like a
lot of other organizations.  It's mainly done privately, and without any
knowledge of who Red Hat associates work for.  Because this BS happens.

Because some many people think we're all tunnel-visioned ... when they are
the ones themselves.

-- bjs

P.S.  Furthermore ... keep this in mind ...

Red Hat's not like proprietary vendors where it introduces something new to
replace something that works well.  Red Hat has no financial incentive to
do so, because it doesn't charge for upgrades or new features.  Red Hat
subscriptions just entitle a customer to a product, not any specific
version, new features, etc...


--
Bryan J Smith - Professional, Technical Annoyance
b.j.smith at ieee.org - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to