On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Reinier Kleipool < [email protected]> wrote:
> Yes the Key Knowledge Areas looks better. I agree that iscsd and > iscsid.conf should be included. Further I would (And many others on this > list...) like to see "Awareness of the purpose of multipathing in FC" added > as well. Maybe add to term and utilities "device-mapper-multipath, > mpathconf, /etc/multipath.conf, awareness of vendor implementations" > Are we not running the risk of making LPIC-2 too enterprise-y? Remember, we have people from around the world taking these exams. And many of them are playing catchup with the technology. Thoughts everyone? --matt > > Reinier > > On 7-6-2013 19:39, G. Matthew Rice wrote: > > Here's a link to the draft, as well: > > > http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-2_Objectives_V4#204.2_Adjusting_Storage_Device_Access_.28weight:_2.29 > > I should have included that in the previous e-mail. > > PS - The question still stands on iscsid...I'm thinking it should be > included. > > I've also dropped it from the 'Future Considerations' section. :) > > Regards, > --matt > > > > -- > [image: OSA logo] Vriendelijke Groet / Kind Regards, > Reinier Kleipool > > *Open Source Academy <http://www.OpenSourceAcademy.eu>* > Rotterdamserijweg 122 > 3042 AS Rotterdam > the Netherlands > T: +31 654 227144 > E: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > -- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20
<<osa_logo.png>>
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
