On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Edward Haletky <[email protected]> wrote:
> LPIC-1 or 2 they are VERY basic. Everyone needs to know how to do them. > Well, I wasn't going to go too far in my opinion, but yes, that is my view too, _if_ we are going to cover virtualization sub-LPIC-3. > Agreed. However, knowing ovirt/RHEV/Openstack GUIs are important as well. > oVirt/RHEV is just too stack-specific, even if oVirt was supposed to be the generic management/user interface framework for more than just KVM. OpenStack would require its own series of exams. But yes, it's looking more and more like it's the solution everyone is getting behind (except only one, proprietary company). 2 or a speciality of 3 but keep it to KVM, Xen, OpenVZ, etc. and also cloud > layers such as OpenStack. > OpenStack as a Hypervisor does get rather interesting. But as a rule, Upstream buy-in matters. > We cannot avoid identity but that should be part of a security > specialization. > The bigger question is ... We can have specialty exams on Virtualization, Storage and Identity ... but how do we bring them together? If you think LPI is the only organization wrestling with this, think again. ;) I do not see a forth level either but multiple specialty levels. Yet, since > virtualization is a must then put the basics lower down for KVM and make > openvswitch, migration, etc a speciality. > LPI has to be careful to avoid making it Hypervisor-centric, even if there is only one, totally open source stack out there, and it is built around KVM. -- Bryan J Smith - Professional, Technical Annoyance b.j.smith at ieee.org - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
