Good question, but I have to ask: Is LPI really in the business of testing a candidate's direct knowledge of awk, perl or <insert any tool here>?
I think not. I think LPI rather tests a bunch of tools and if the candidate scores above 50% percentile on that section, then it's a good bet they know other related tools well enough to make the grade. I'd vote to include awk, but not perl. For the simple reason that every question I can think of for perl tests perl's syntax; and this is a sysadmin rating exam, not a programmer exam. On 24/06/2014 18:15, Ingo Wichmann wrote: > and perl, too. > > Ingo > > Am 24.06.2014 17:56, schrieb César : >> hi, >> >> awk is a good utility that should be know. >> >> http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-1_Objectives_V4#103.7_Search_text_files_using_regular_expressions >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Linux System Administrator >> César Prieto Ballester >> >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/cesarprietoballester >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lpi-examdev mailing list >> lpi-examdev@lpi.org >> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >> > > -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
