On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati < fabioloc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that 99% of the times the same action could be done in different > ways, with different programs. I think LPI should accept awk/perl based > answers but should not enforce the usage of any of the two, at least in > LPIC1. It could be a topic for more advanced LPI certification, imho. > Hence why regular expressions exist for a reason. ;) I end up doing far more sed (single-line) and perl (multi-line) because they tend to be the easiest solutions for regex. I also found sed to be the most consistent and capable in busybox, unlike busybox implementations of other tools. -- bjs -- Bryan J Smith - UCF '97 Engr ----------------------------------------------------------------- "In a way, Bortles is the personification of the UCF football program. Each has many of the elements that everyone claims to want, and yet they are nobody's first choice. Coming out of high school, Bortles had the size and the arm to play at a more prestigious program. UCF likewise has the market size and the talent base to play in a more prestigious conference than the American Athletic. But timing and circumstances conspired to put both where they are now." -- Andy Staples, CNN-Sports Illustrated
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
