On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Alexandru Juncu <al...@linux.com> wrote: > About the "Subnetting", how in depth should this be treated? Because, > for example, Cisco CCNA courses dedicate entire chapter for this. I > noticed that LPIC treaded the idea of subnet only at classful > boundaries (with class A,B and C subnet masks). Will this still be > the case or any subnet masks be valid (in this case, I would add the > concept of dotted quad representation of netmasks and prefix > notation).
We've dumped the notion of Class A/B/C networks. It is full /n subnetting that is expected knowledge. And dotted quads are also expected knowledge for netmasks, too. > (I resent this message, don't know why it was not published on the ml before). Perhaps you sent it from a different e-mail address. I did that this morning and had to resend three of my e-mails. Regards, --matt -- G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
