On 07/15/2014 08:21 PM, G. Matthew Rice wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Alexandru Juncu <al...@linux.com> wrote: >> About the "Subnetting", how in depth should this be treated? Because, >> for example, Cisco CCNA courses dedicate entire chapter for this. I >> noticed that LPIC treaded the idea of subnet only at classful >> boundaries (with class A,B and C subnet masks). Will this still be >> the case or any subnet masks be valid (in this case, I would add the >> concept of dotted quad representation of netmasks and prefix >> notation). > We've dumped the notion of Class A/B/C networks. It is full /n > subnetting that is expected knowledge. > > And dotted quads are also expected knowledge for netmasks, too.
Would it help to add CIDR as the list of terms? Not addressing ancient network classes seems good to me and with IPv6 becoming more popular the overall concept of CIDR should be familiar to all candidates. Regards, Fabian _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
