On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Anselm Lingnau
<anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de> wrote:
> Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
>
>> 211.2 procmail
>>   Does anyone use procmail anymore ? I used it myself in the 90's.
>>   But I want to torture my students teaching than procmail rules in details.

I must be a dinosaur. :)

Two years ago, I set up a gmail->fetchmail->procmail "thingy" to grab
daily e-mails of new LPI (and related terms) job posts from various
job boards to keep some stats on our popularity.


>> 207.3 Securing a DNS Server
>>   I think DNSSEC are too advanced topic here.
>
> I don't think it is entirely out of place for an LPIC-2 candidate to know what
> problems DNSSEC is supposed to solve, and how this is achieved. As far as the
> details of setting up a DNSSEC zone is concerned, I agree that this is
> probably beyond LPIC-2 – and IIRC it isn't currently part of the exam in the
> first place.
>
> Having said that, with important things like DANE on the horizon, DNSSEC will
> probably become more important in the future and should eventually find a
> place somewhere in the LPI universe, but whether LPI-202 is that place is
> probably doubtful.

I've added this to the wiki page for consideration in LPIC-2 and 303
(which should be updated next year).

Regards,
--matt

-- 
G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org>                         gpg id: EF9AAD20
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to