On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Anselm Lingnau <anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de> wrote: > Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote: > >> 211.2 procmail >> Does anyone use procmail anymore ? I used it myself in the 90's. >> But I want to torture my students teaching than procmail rules in details.
I must be a dinosaur. :) Two years ago, I set up a gmail->fetchmail->procmail "thingy" to grab daily e-mails of new LPI (and related terms) job posts from various job boards to keep some stats on our popularity. >> 207.3 Securing a DNS Server >> I think DNSSEC are too advanced topic here. > > I don't think it is entirely out of place for an LPIC-2 candidate to know what > problems DNSSEC is supposed to solve, and how this is achieved. As far as the > details of setting up a DNSSEC zone is concerned, I agree that this is > probably beyond LPIC-2 – and IIRC it isn't currently part of the exam in the > first place. > > Having said that, with important things like DANE on the horizon, DNSSEC will > probably become more important in the future and should eventually find a > place somewhere in the LPI universe, but whether LPI-202 is that place is > probably doubtful. I've added this to the wiki page for consideration in LPIC-2 and 303 (which should be updated next year). Regards, --matt -- G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev