On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Éric Deschamps <erd...@free.fr> wrote: > The summary of major changes describes it as:
hi Eric, As Reinier mentioned, it is a lot to cover for a weighting of 4. However, if you include 210.3 LDAP client usage, you're up to 6 weights which makes it 10% of the exam. That said and don't hold me to this, but > - LDIF format and changetype: do my attendee need to know every > changetype as it was in 301.1? There's only 4 of them right? Covering CRUD operations and moddn. This doesn't seem to onerous yet. :) > - loglevel: do my attendee need to know that loglevel 256 means stats, > or do they just need to know the keyword and that you can add the values? I think that you're safe covering it as a keyword and that the values can be ORed together. If I was writing courseware, I'd point out some of the more useful values, too. > - slapd.conf and or cn=config? Transition from slapd.conf to cn=config? > slaptest command? Yes. Yes. And, it wouldn't hurt. slaptest isn't explicitly mentioned in the objectives but knowledge of it is useful. > - which version of OpenLDAP? The ones on CentOS/RedHat6 and Debian 7? I think that's fine. > - whitepages: schemas needed or more? I think that's fine, too. > - Directories: LDAP concepts, history with X.500, ports, different > models, URL formats, types of DIT, major attributes? You should be safe with sticking with the "Key Knowledge Areas" that are mentioned in the objectives. > - ACL with slapacl? (in this case, we should add it to the list of > utilities). Up to you. I don't think that it's mentioned in the exam content and we are trying to keep the overall coverage as light as possible. HTH, --matt -- G. Matthew Rice <m...@starnix.com> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
