Ok, it seems clearer. I'll try to manage with that, many thanks for your
answers, Reineier, Bryan and Matt!

Kind Regards,

Éric

Le 10/02/2015 16:30, G. Matthew Rice a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Éric Deschamps <erd...@free.fr> wrote:
>> The summary of major changes describes it as:
> 
> hi Eric,
> 
> As Reinier mentioned, it is a lot to cover for a weighting of 4.
> However, if you include 210.3 LDAP client usage, you're up to 6
> weights which makes it 10% of the exam.
> 
> That said and don't hold me to this, but
> 
> 
>> - LDIF format and changetype: do my attendee need to know every
>> changetype as it was in 301.1?
> 
> There's only 4 of them right?  Covering CRUD operations and moddn.
> This doesn't seem to onerous yet. :)
> 
> 
>> - loglevel: do my attendee need to know that loglevel 256 means stats,
>> or do they just need to know the keyword and that you can add the values?
> 
> I think that you're safe covering it as a keyword and that the values
> can be ORed together.  If I was writing courseware, I'd point out some
> of the more useful values, too.
> 
> 
>> - slapd.conf and or cn=config? Transition from slapd.conf to cn=config?
>> slaptest command?
> 
> Yes.  Yes.
> And, it wouldn't hurt.  slaptest isn't explicitly mentioned in the
> objectives but knowledge of it is useful.
> 
> 
>> - which version of OpenLDAP? The ones on CentOS/RedHat6 and Debian 7?
> 
> I think that's fine.
> 
>> - whitepages: schemas needed or more?
> 
> I think that's fine, too.
> 
> 
>> - Directories: LDAP concepts, history with X.500, ports, different
>> models, URL formats, types of DIT, major attributes?
> 
> You should be safe with sticking with the "Key Knowledge Areas" that
> are mentioned in the objectives.
> 
> 
>> - ACL with slapacl? (in this case, we should add it to the list of
>> utilities).
> 
> Up to you.  I don't think that it's mentioned in the exam content and
> we are trying to keep the overall coverage as light as possible.
> 
> HTH,
> --matt
> 

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to