Dear Fabian, I got the same opinion like harald, you and some others. NT4 is not supported from Microsoft, a long time ago. AD is the only possibility. So NT4 should go. As Harald said, NetBios is only part of compatibilty with old systems. But this should be very rare. WINS should be the same.
The shift from Samba 3 to 4 is very welcome. The other topics should be okay from my point of view. I scrolled through all of it and they seems to be okay. Regards Maik Wienströer -----Original Message----- From: Fabian Thorns <ftho...@lpi.org> To: This is the lpi-examdev mailing list. <lpi-examdev@lpi.org> Sent: Sat, Sep 17, 2016 8:17 pm Subject: [lpi-examdev] LPIC-300 Objective Discussion Dear all, taking a look at https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-3_300_Objectives_V1 You will notice that it's time to review the current LPIC-300 objectives to ensure they are still up to date. Therefore I'd like you all to share your thoughts about our current objectives with the list, including wishes what should be changed in the next update. We have however to obey that it will be "minor update", so we can't fundamentally turn the while exam around. Some things we should discuss from my point of view would be: * Relevance of NT4 domains vs. AD domains * Same for NBNS vs. DNS * Shift from Samba 3 to Samba 4 (which shouldn't cause too much trouble, though) However, I don't want to limit the discussion on these points. Just go ahead and point out what you think. As usual, I will comment when necessary and condense all the comments into a draft for potential updated objectives which we will then review altogether again. Looking forward to an interesting discussion, Fabian _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
