On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:47 AM, G. Matthew Rice <m...@starnix.com> wrote:
>
> I'm sure that both of these sources will be used as reference material for
> the BoK (assuming enough people agree that a BoK is the best course of
> action) and that, once complete, the BoK(s) will then make great reference
> material in future versions of those books.
>
Since I'm now responding to my own emails, I'm making this my last post on
the thread (for the day ;)).
Another reason I'm leaning heavily to the BoK idea is that translations
would be a snap compared to some eloquent English prose (or German, French,
etc). If anyone has used tools like OmegaT (which has some warts but is
great if you supply it the right formatted files):
http://www.omegat.org/
the translation memory would make it easy to follow revisions, too.
Regards,
--matt
--
G. Matthew Rice <m...@starnix.com> gpg id:
0x17CF9077
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
