Il 16/10/2017 12:35, G. Matthew Rice ha scritto: > I don't think consensus on which editor should be conflated with > consensus on covering an editor. For example, if we did that, there > would have been a time when LPIC-2 covered no MTAs and, currently, no > HTTP servers. (Did I just open a can of worms?) > My doubt is if covering an editor as such (any kind of editor) is really needed. I don't think so anyone has his preferred editor, and he will use that one.
That aside, the use case of vi for emergency editing as the only option available in my opinion is still worth considering. But just in that use, so nothing more than thee most basic editing command are required. Things like key multipliers, ore the use of h,j,k,l instead of arrows are outside that use. Anything more that i, esc for going insert mode, / to search and the way to exit saving or not saving is superflous. Three question on an editor that you can have to use only in emergencies and two on topic far more relevant, like 104.1 or 104.2 are too much, in my opinion one is enough. Simone -- Simone Piccardi Truelite Srl picca...@truelite.it (email/jabber) Via Monferrato, 6 Tel. +39-347-1032433 50142 Firenze http://www.truelite.it Tel. +39-055-7879597 Fax. +39-055-7333336 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
