> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 11 00:57:03 2000
> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:53:27 +1000
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: LPRng lpd should not be SETUID root
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 04:18:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > SUMMARY:
> > 
> > Versions of LPRng-3.6.1-LPRng-3.6.15 installed the 'lpd' program 'SETUID root'
> > by default.
> > 
> > The lpd executable should be OWNED by root, but not SETUID root.
> I believe that Debian has not had lpd setuid root for a long time if at
> all.
> While we are on a setuid thread, is the following safe?
> chmod u+s `pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/bin/lpr
> chmod u+s `pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/bin/lprm
> chmod u+s `pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/bin/lpq
>                        
>   - Craig
> -- 
> Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
> Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                 Debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No.  But, if you want to have Total compatibility with RFC1179, you
need it.   If you are only printing to LPRng servers,  then turn it off.

Patrick Powell

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body.  For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST,  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with:                           | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr>       |  subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr>     |  unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you have major problems,  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to