hi,

I don't mean SOLARIS patches (which usually destroy as many things as they
repair) I mean a LPRng patch 3.6.26 for ex didn't show the two additional
lines on exactly the same machine. Is there a way to get rid of them ?

regards
              ~christoph

P.S.: Did you check the packages on the ftp server, I still can not
install the latest stuff due to checksum errors (?)

regards
                        ~christoph






On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Patrick Powell wrote:

> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec  4 21:49:45 2001
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 05:43:06 +0100 (MET)
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: LPRng: lpstat message in 3.8.1
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > I remeber that from an earlier version and it had been fixed but it seems
> > to have reappeared in 3.8.1. There are 2 additional lines in the lpstat
> > response (the first 2 ones):
> >
> > [printsrv4] ~ $ lpstat -ppubtest
> > printer pubtest unknown state. enabled since Dec 05 05:30 2001. available
> > printer pubtest unknown state. enabled since Dec 05 05:30 2001. available
> > Printer: pubtest@spoolc (dest pubps2@spoola,spoolb)
> >  Queue: no printable jobs in queue
> > Printer: pubps2@spoola 'HP_8150DN PS_2 2 A4 p Operators, 5005,
> > A4/foil-automatic'
> >  Queue: no printable jobs in queue
> >  Status: job 'mkowalsk@pbaik2+767' removed at 18:37:03
> >  Filter_status: (of) done at 18:37:03.841
> >
> > A few applications, mainly around ORACLE report software parse the lpstat
> > output, see the 'unknown state' or just the additional 2 lines and don't
> > print (users get confused too)
> >
> > Is there a way to suppress the 2 lines (others than wrapper scripts) or is
> > it fixed in a newer release ?
> >
> > regards
> >     ~christoph
> >
>
> This is compatible with Solaris output.
>
> Of course,  you need to guess which version of Solaris,  and which
> patch changed it...  Sigh.
>
> Solaris 2.5 2.5.1 2.6 2.6 +patches 7 7+patches 7+patches+patches
> 8 (don't know about patches yet).
>
> If you have a support contract you can rattle my chain and I will
> try to put out a version compatible with your site requirements,
> but I really really suggest that you modify the Oracle stuff.
>
> Of course,  the next Solaris updqate will change the format...
> So you might as well get used to this.
>
> Patrick
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
> The address you post from MUST be your subscription address
>
> If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
> or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body.  For the impatient,
> to subscribe to a list with name LIST,  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with:                           | example:
> subscribe LIST <mailaddr>       |  subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr>     |  unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If you have major problems,  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
> LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from MUST be your subscription address

If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body.  For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST,  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with:                           | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr>       |  subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr>     |  unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you have major problems,  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to