Hi there, I've been running some tests on a Xerox Phaser 4400 and am seeing delays of more than a minute when printing to the Socket API port, i.e. port 9100.
At first I thought it might be a problem with LPRng or our filters, but this doesn't seem to be the case, as sending postscript directly to the port also produces the same delays, whereas printing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is instantaneous. Here's an example of what I mean: Sending job directly to port 9100 of the xerox printer takes over a minute: [host]lp: time nc xerox_printer 9100 < ~toby/linux/SOURCES/LPRng-3.8.21/UTILS/one.ps real 1m15.754s user 0m0.010s sys 0m0.000s ... but the same command to an HP printer is immediate [host]lp: time nc hp_printer 9100 < ~toby/linux/SOURCES/LPRng-3.8.21/UTILS/one.ps real 0m0.022s user 0m0.010s sys 0m0.000s [sybies]lp: lpr [EMAIL PROTECTED] is also instantaneous. Has anyone else seen this kind of problem? What do others use in the lp= part of printcaps for Xerox Phasers? Thanks in advance Toby Blake University of Edinburgh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST The address you post from MUST be your subscription address If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient, to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with: | example: subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
