On 04/14/2016 11:36 AM, Dallman, John wrote: > Mats wrote: > >> it's something we'll have to look into. Like I said, I don't quite remember >> the >> details - my memory hints that there were some non-LSB symbols emitted if >> you go >> the stack protector route, and they'd need to make an appearance in an LSB >> version >> to be usable, if so. It's not technically a complex issue if that's the >> case, >> but logistically... will there be an LSB update that could do this? > > OK. Is there anything I should do? Open a bug, or something?
you could comment on https://lsbbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4157 if there's something you're like to add - or at least add yourself to the Cc list. I also opened 4156 for the slightly botched version handling you pointed out. > > I'm a bit concerned by the question "will there be an LSB update that could > do this?" Things seem to have been very quiet on LSB for a while: is the > project in danger of shutting down? it has been very quiet. I can't speak to plans; there have been hints of some things happening for a while but I haven't heard anything concrete. I'm personally too busy with work to contribute much. _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
