From: Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >/usr/share/man alone is not sufficient. Not all man pages are platform > >independant. I'd favour keeping both therefore > > Or even system independent. Software installed here may not be > installed there. I would also vote to maintain both, with clear > guidelines as to why one might choose one over the other.
How is this going to solve the issue of system-independent commands which expect to find system-idependent manpages in /usr/man? My vote is a symbolic link from /usr/man to /usr/share/man. I thought the "local commands manpages" convention was /usr/local/man anyway? -- Julie.
