From: Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Julie wrote: > > I thought the "local commands manpages" convention was > > /usr/local/man anyway? > > Ya, that's a good argument, but I wouldn't expect to see a > 'mount' manpage there though.
=You=, personally, might not, but the manpage formatting glarp generally understands /usr/man or /usr/share/man as having "common" manpages and /usr/local/man as having the local stuff. I've yet to see a system which had all three of those as separate directories with all three needing to be scanned. This isn't to say someone hasn't made such a system, only that I've not seen one (which means that Glarpnix will be coming out next week with precisely that arrangement ...) -- Julie.
