On 18/01/10 22:53, Clément OUDOT wrote: > 2010/1/18 Jonathan Clarke <[email protected]>: >> Le 17/01/2010 02:05, Sebastien Bahloul a écrit : >>> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> I was looking at the 1.2 branch to identify what is required before >>> publishing >>> a new stable version and I notice severeals items : >>> - completing web site documentation : I think it's now require to separate >>> a >>> documentation between different major versions. Some elements can be >>> shared or >>> referred in the previous versions, but for example, the quick start must >>> be >>> updated and I think this is important not to loose the previous work >> >> Absolutely. Should we divide the doc section of the wiki into sub-sections >> per major version? ie, documentation/1.2/blah instead of documentation/blah? >> >> I would like to get a simple version of the user guide out for 1.2 release, >> as well (http://lsc-project.org/user-guide/). By the way - someone who >> understands CSS / has some taste still really needs to look at the style of >> that guide! :) >> > > I can have a look on the CSS if you want, but maybe you should tell me > what your are expecting.
That would be great! I'm only expecting something simple: ie, that makes the document display correctly, preferably using LSC's colour chart. And the more professional looking it is, the better! :) Thanks Clément, Jonathan -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Clarke - [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------- Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org -------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________________________ Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org lsc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev
