I have been using the 2.0 RC for a while now. It is stable enough for my purposes, so I think your suggestion is a good one.
Hugh On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > we work on 2.0 since a long time now, and despite all our efforts, we > still only provide a buggy 2.0rc2 on the website. > > I know we still have issues in 2.0 (you can check the roadmap: > http://tools.lsc-project.org/projects/lsc/roadmap), but most of the > core features are stable now. > > So I would like us to release a 2.0 as it is, and work on a 2.0.1 or > 2.1 to fix remaining issues. > > > What do you think? > > > Clément. > _______________________________________________________________ > Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org > > lsc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev >
_______________________________________________________________ Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org lsc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev
