Thanks for your answer Any other vote? Le 5 juil. 2012 17:20, "Hugh Kelley" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> I have been using the 2.0 RC for a while now. It is stable enough for my > purposes, so I think your suggestion is a good one. > > Hugh > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Clément OUDOT <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> we work on 2.0 since a long time now, and despite all our efforts, we >> still only provide a buggy 2.0rc2 on the website. >> >> I know we still have issues in 2.0 (you can check the roadmap: >> http://tools.lsc-project.org/projects/lsc/roadmap), but most of the >> core features are stable now. >> >> So I would like us to release a 2.0 as it is, and work on a 2.0.1 or >> 2.1 to fix remaining issues. >> >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> Clément. >> _______________________________________________________________ >> Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org >> >> lsc-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________________________ Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org lsc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev
