Hi Les, This sounds good. I would suggest being liberal in receive (i.e. accept and interpret the incorrect encoding) and there is no need to send that erroneous encoding.
Thanks, Ketan -----Original Message----- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: 17 July 2018 13:30 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[email protected]>; Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]>; Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00 Ketan - Thanx for taking on the role of shepherd. I am attaching some proposed diffs which I think addresses your concern. Let me know if this suffices and we can publish an update. Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:55 AM > To: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > <[email protected]>; Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00 > > Hi All, > > I was reviewing this draft as the Shepherd. It is a fairly simple and > straightforward bis update to RFC7810 to fix an encoding error. > > There is one point that I would like the authors and WG to consider. > > The draft in the appendix talks about two interpretations of the > erroneous sub- TLVs and from the conversation on the list I get the > impression that there are at least two implementations out there which > did different interpretations. Do we want to consider putting in a > suggestion (i.e. not normative perhaps) that implementations updated > to this specifications accept the sub-TLV with the Reserved field > included and size 5? So they don't consider such an encoding as error or > malformed on reception? > > Thanks, > Ketan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) > Sent: 18 June 2018 17:38 > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>; Christian Hopps > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00 > > Hi Les, > Yes - the Working Group Last call has completed. We'll find a shepherd > and request publication. > Thanks, > Acee > > On 6/15/18, 10:49 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > WG chairs - > > Can we consider WG last call completed? (It has been more than 3 > weeks...) > > Would really like to get this small but important correction > published ASAP > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
