Toerless,
On 15/11/18 03:29 , Toerless Eckert wrote:
Whats the current best guidance on using DSCP for selection of path,
specifically for selection of topology with MTR (RFCs 4915, 5120, 7722) ?
My understanding from history is that this looked like a good idea
to customers first, but when implementations became available,
customers really did not want to implement it because of the overloading
of DSCP between QoS and routing and the resulting management complexity.
Has the idea of using DSCP for path selection been re-introduced in any
later work like flex-Algos ?
no, but if someone wanted to do so it can.
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo does not say anything about DHCP.
thanks,
Peter
If there could be rough consensus that this is in general a bad idea, i wonder
if it would be appropriate to have a short normative document from LSR
defining that the use of DSCP for topology selection is historic and
not recommended anymore and make this an update to above three RFCs,
maybe also pointing out that there are other methods to select a
topology and those remain viable:
I specifically would not like to see the actual MTR RFCs to be changed
in status, because MTR actually does work quite well and is supported
in products and deployed with IP multicast, even with multiple
topologies for IP multicast in live-live scenarios.
Thanks!
Toerless
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
