So to have something to look at while we discuss this I wrote a bare-bones module document for IS-IS reverse metrics:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-00 If you look at the meat of that document and then imagine including it as an appendix or whatever with the functional IS-IS reverse metric document (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8500) it doesn't seem that onerous of an addition. And it makes things very nice for the actual users/operators. Overall publishing time should improve b/c we have 1 document to shepherd through the IETF process instead of 2. And, again, if the YANG module is not straight-forward then having separate documents makes sense to me as well. I think we should give it a try with some small upcoming LSR draft -- we can always rip out the management section if it's causing issues. Thanks, Chris.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
