Russ -

The WG just went through a lengthy consideration of multiple flooding 
optimization drafts and selected 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding/ as the 
vehicle for the WG to use to move forward in this area.

It would be good if, in the context of the above, you articulated why it makes 
sense for the WG to do yet another round of such discussion. 

(Full disclosure: I am a co-author on draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding - but my 
question isn't coming from that perspective. )

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 1:25 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-white-distoptflood-
> 00.txt
> 
> 
> FYI -- I've put just the flooding optimizations from the openfabric work into 
> a
> separate draft and submitted it. I've also modified the wording a bit, as 
> this is
> applicable far beyond data center fabrics.
> 
> 😊 /r
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:24 PM
> > To: Shawn Zandi <[email protected]>; Russ White <[email protected]>
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-white-distoptflood-00.txt
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-white-distoptflood-00.txt has been successfully
> > submitted by Russ White and posted to the IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:               draft-white-distoptflood
> > Revision:   00
> > Title:              IS-IS Optimal Distributed Flooding for Dense Topologies
> > Document date:      2019-03-31
> > Group:              Individual Submission
> > Pages:              13
> > URL:            
> > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-distoptflood-
> > 00.txt
> > Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-distoptflood/
> > Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-white-distoptflood-00
> > Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-white-
> distoptflood
> >
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    Dense topologies, such as data center fabrics based on the Clos and
> >    butterfly fabric topologies.  Flooding mechanisms designed for sparse
> >    topologies, when used in these dense topologies, can result in slower
> >    convergence times and higher resource utilization.  The modifications
> >    to the flooding mechanism in the Intermediate System to Intermediate
> >    System (IS-IS) link state protocol described in this document reduce
> >    resource utilization to a minimum, while increaseing convergence
> >    performance in dense topologies.
> >
> >    Note that a Clos fabric is used as the primary example of a desne
> >    flooding topology throughout this document.  However, the flooding
> >    optimizations described in this document apply to any dense topology.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to