> The WG just went through a lengthy consideration of multiple flooding > optimization drafts and selected https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf- > lsr-dynamic-flooding/ as the vehicle for the WG to use to move forward in > this area.
Yep. > It would be good if, in the context of the above, you articulated why it makes > sense for the WG to do yet another round of such discussion. == In this idea, the flooding topology is computed within an IGP area with the dense topology either centrally on an elected node, termed the Area Leader, or in a distributed manner on all nodes that are supporting Dynamic Flooding. == Because this is only one way to solve the problem... The process outlined in the draft I just published is a different and simpler way that applies to a wider range of topologies than the dynamic flooding draft does, afaict. 😊 /r _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
