On July 30, 2019 at 11:44:20 AM, Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
[Speaking as an author.] Mirja: Hi! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sec 1: "This document updates [RFC5786] so that a router can also announce one or more local X-AF addresses using the corresponding Local Address sub-TLV. Routers using the Node Attribute TLV [RFC5786] can include non-TE enabled interface addresses in their OSPF TE advertisements, and also use the same sub-TLVs to carry X-AF information, facilitating the mapping described above." I wonder if this text should use normative language (s/can/MAY/) as this is the part that actually updates RFC5786, however, I didn't check the exact wording in RFC5786... We left the Normative language in Section 3, where the actual specification is made. I don’t have a strong opinion as to whether there’s a need for it in the Introduction…so I’ll defer to the AD. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
