Hi Les! -07 addresses all of my concerns. The quick update is appreciated.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 8:49 PM > To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Uma Chunduri > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis- > 06: (with COMMENT) > > Roman - > > Thanx for the review. > I have uploaded V7 of the draft to address your comments. > > Responses inline. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 7:45 AM > > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; Uma Chunduri > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: > > (with COMMENT) > > > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > > this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > (1) Section 3.1. The two “NOTE” statements in this section seem to > > conflict: > > -- NOTE: These timers are NOT applicable to a router which is > > preparing to do a planned restart. > > > > -- NOTE: The timer T3 is only used by a restarting router. > > [Les:] I have added text indicating that T1/T2 can be used both by a > restarting > router and starting router (details were already provided in the respective > sections later in the document) but that T3 is only used by a restarting > router. > The second NOTE has been deleted. > > > > > (2) Per the definition of the “Remaining Time” field, when is it the > > “remaining holding time” vs. “recommended holding time" > > [Les:] I have removed the term "recommended" which is not otherwise used > in the document. Both of these are work for me. Thank you. > > > > (3) Editorial Nits: > > -- Multiple places. s/signalling/signaling/g > > [Les:] It depends whether you are British or not. 😊 > As the original lead author of RFC 5306 was British I have conformed to the > British spelling. > If you think that is not right, I suggest we let the RFC Editor decide. No problem. (*Embarrassed*) I forgot that there was an alternate spelling. Roman _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
