> On May 4, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Henk Smit <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm looking forward to seeing (an outline of) your algorithm.

I'm not trying to push any particular algorithm, we already have some 
proposals. My intention was only to suggest that we not disregard solutions too 
aggressively. The argument that there are too many queues in one routers 
implementation of a punt path, or there are so few or none that one can't tell 
IS-IS from other traffic early enough doesn't mean that one couldn't consider 
what *would* be required for a simple solution to be viable. If a simple 
solution is elegant enough then perhaps market forces start coming in to play 
and the cost to implement isn't actually that high.

In any case we already have a couple proposed semi-solutions and during the 
meeting it seemed to be agreed that people would write some code and collect 
some data at this point.

Thanks,
Chris.
[as WG member]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to