> On May 4, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Henk Smit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing (an outline of) your algorithm.
I'm not trying to push any particular algorithm, we already have some
proposals. My intention was only to suggest that we not disregard solutions too
aggressively. The argument that there are too many queues in one routers
implementation of a punt path, or there are so few or none that one can't tell
IS-IS from other traffic early enough doesn't mean that one couldn't consider
what *would* be required for a simple solution to be viable. If a simple
solution is elegant enough then perhaps market forces start coming in to play
and the cost to implement isn't actually that high.
In any case we already have a couple proposed semi-solutions and during the
meeting it seemed to be agreed that people would write some code and collect
some data at this point.
Thanks,
Chris.
[as WG member]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr