Hi Eric,
please see inline:
On 11/05/2020 18:02, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is easy to read.
Like other ADs, I wonder why the IS-IS and OSPF are separate documents.
Alvaro has responded to similar query from Barry Leiba.
Please find below one NIT.
I hope that this helps to improve the document,
Regards,
-éric
== NIT ==
-- section 4 --
The "one" is ambiguous in "the router MUST advertise the smallest one." even if
we can guess that it is not "interface" ;-)
ok, what would you like to say instead "one"?
Would this be better:
If a router has multiple interfaces with different capabilities of
reading the maximum label stack depth, the router MUST advertise the
smallest value found across all of its interfaces.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
