I support WG adoption of this draft as experimental track. Kind regards
Gyan On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:32 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tony, > > > If we rely on controller fixing LPM as well under failures then really, > who needs IGPs anymore anyway except for bunch of loopbacks and SPF for the > controller to do all the FIB work and hence discussions like high > hierarchies or anisotropic routing are largely superfluous me thinks ;-) > > > > A fair point that many seem to agree with. The IGP provides topology for > the controller and it simply dominates the control plane. The issue, of > course, is recovery. The IGP is still a necessity to provide reachability > to the controller and to deal with failure recovery. > > I agree that people who do go down the controller path may avoid certain > issues. It also seems to be true that folks who avoid the controller path > avoid other issues. > > Choose your battles… > > T > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
