Hi Amanda, 

´╗┐On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org> wrote:

    Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,

    Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit in 
the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?

    Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x00000010, but that 
value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If Alvaro 
approves, should we register 0x00000020 instead?

Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, I 
don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet. 

    Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration 
procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV 
Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request from 
that ticket.

Fine - Thanks,
Acee

    Best regards,

    Amanda Baber
    Lead IANA Services Specialist

    On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
    > Hi Ketan,  IANA, Alvaro,
    > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV
    > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
    > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
    > 
    > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
    > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
    >       Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
    >               IETF Review
    >       LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags     RFC 5613
    >              Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
    > 
    > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
    > 
    > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
    > approval.
    > Thanks,
    > Acee
    > 
    > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ket...@cisco.com>
    > wrote: ts
    > 
    > Hello Acee/Chris,
    > 
    > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
    > draft.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    >  From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
    > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
    > To: lsr@ietf.org
    > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
    > 01.txt
    > 
    > Hi All,
    > 
    > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
    > review and feedback.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
    > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
    > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
    > Cc: lsr@ietf.org
    > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
    > 
    > 
    > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
    > directories.
    > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
    > 
    > Title           : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
    > Authors         : Ketan Talaulikar
    >                   Peter Psenak
    >                   Albert Fu
    >                   Rajesh M
    > Filename        : draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
    > Pages           : 10
    > Date            : 2020-06-30
    > 
    > Abstract:
    >    This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF
    >    router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding
    >    Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation.  Link-Local
    >    Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement of "strict-
    >    mode" of BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency.  If both
    > OSPF
    >    neighbors advertise the "strict-mode" of BFD, adjacency formation
    >    will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully
    >    established.
    > 
    > 
    > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/
    > 
    > There are also htmlized versions available at:
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-
    > mode-01
    > 
    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
    > 01
    > 
    > 
    > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
    > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
    > tools.ietf.org.
    > 
    > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    > 


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to