That was easy! :-) Thanks!
Alvaro. On July 2, 2020 at 10:24:20 AM, Peter Psenak ([email protected]) wrote: Hi Alvaro, On 02/07/2020 16:04, Alvaro Retana wrote: > Acee: > > Can you please get positive confirmation from the authors of > draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding? I'm one of them and I can confirm for myself. thanks, Peter > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > On July 2, 2020 at 5:50:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) > ([email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: > >> Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS >> rather than OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is >> safter. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Psenak <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11 >> To: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for >> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode >> >> Hi Ketan, Acee, >> >> On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> > Hi Amanda, >> > >> > On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Acee, Alvaro, all, >> > >> > Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs? >> > >> > Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x00000010, but that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If Alvaro approves, should we register 0x00000020 instead? >> >> I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of >> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the >> 0x00000010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for >> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding. >> >> thanks, >> Peter >> >> > >> > Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet. >> > >> > Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request from that ticket. >> > >> > Fine - Thanks, >> > Acee >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Amanda Baber >> > Lead IANA Services Specialist >> > >> > On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro, >> > > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV >> > > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective >> > > registries in the IANA section (included below for info). >> > > >> > > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) - >> > > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV) >> > > Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613 >> > > IETF Review >> > > LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613 >> > > Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak) >> > > >> > > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied). >> > > >> > > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD >> > > approval. >> > > Thanks, >> > > Acee >> > > >> > > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > wrote: ts >> > > >> > > Hello Acee/Chris, >> > > >> > > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this >> > > draft. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) >> > > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25 >> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode- >> > > 01.txt >> > > >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to >> > > review and feedback. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Lsr <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20 >> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt >> > > >> > > >> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> > > directories. >> > > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. >> > > >> > > Title : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD >> > > Authors : Ketan Talaulikar >> > > Peter Psenak >> > > Albert Fu >> > > Rajesh M >> > > Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt >> > > Pages : 10 >> > > Date : 2020-06-30 >> > > >> > > Abstract: >> > > This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF >> > > router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding >> > > Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation. Link-Local >> > > Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement of "strict- >> > > mode" of BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency. If both >> > > OSPF >> > > neighbors advertise the "strict-mode" of BFD, adjacency formation >> > > will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully >> > > established. >> > > >> > > >> > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/ >> > > >> > > There are also htmlized versions available at: >> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01 >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict- >> > > mode-01 >> > > >> > > A diff from the previous version is available at: >> > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode- >> > > 01 >> > > >> > > >> > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> > > tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. >> > > >> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Lsr mailing list >> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
