That was easy! :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 2, 2020 at 10:24:20 AM, Peter Psenak (ppse...@cisco.com) wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

On 02/07/2020 16:04, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> Acee:
>
> Can you please get positive confirmation from the authors of
> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?

I'm one of them and I can confirm for myself.

thanks,
Peter


>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On July 2, 2020 at 5:50:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
> (acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org
> <mailto:acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>) wrote:
>
>> Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS
>> rather than OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is
>> safter.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ket...@cisco.com
>> <mailto:ket...@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Psenak <ppse...@cisco.com <mailto:ppse...@cisco.com>>
>> Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
>> To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com <mailto:a...@cisco.com>>;
>> iana-prot-pa...@iana.org <mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
>> Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
>> <ket...@cisco.com <mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>;
>> gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com <mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>;
>> alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com <mailto:alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com>
>> Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for
>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
>>
>> Hi Ketan, Acee,
>>
>> On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> > Hi Amanda,
>> >
>> > On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-pa...@iana.org
<mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,
>> >
>> > Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the
B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
>> >
>> > Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x00000010, but
that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If
Alvaro approves, should we register 0x00000020 instead?
>>
>> I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of
>> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the
>> 0x00000010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for
>> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Peter
>>
>> >
>> > Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode
configuration, I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet.
>> >
>> > Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different
registration procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local
Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert
review request from that ticket.
>> >
>> > Fine - Thanks,
>> > Acee
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Amanda Baber
>> > Lead IANA Services Specialist
>> >
>> > On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com <mailto:a...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>> > > Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro,
>> > > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and
TLV
>> > > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
>> > > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
>> > >
>> > > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
>> > > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
>> > > Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
>> > > IETF Review
>> > > LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
>> > > Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
>> > >
>> > > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
>> > >
>> > > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
>> > > approval.
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Acee
>> > >
>> > > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ket...@cisco.com
<mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>
>> > > wrote: ts
>> > >
>> > > Hello Acee/Chris,
>> > >
>> > > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
>> > > draft.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
>> > > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
>> > > To: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
>> > > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
>> > > 01.txt
>> > >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
>> > > review and feedback.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On
Behalf Of
>> internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
>> > > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
>> > > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>
>> > > Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
>> > > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> > > directories.
>> > > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
>> > >
>> > > Title : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
>> > > Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
>> > > Peter Psenak
>> > > Albert Fu
>> > > Rajesh M
>> > > Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
>> > > Pages : 10
>> > > Date : 2020-06-30
>> > >
>> > > Abstract:
>> > > This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF
>> > > router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding
>> > > Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation. Link-Local
>> > > Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement of "strict-
>> > > mode" of BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency. If both
>> > > OSPF
>> > > neighbors advertise the "strict-mode" of BFD, adjacency formation
>> > > will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully
>> > > established.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/
>> > >
>> > > There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01
>> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-
>> > > mode-01
>> > >
>> > > A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> > >
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
>> > > 01
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>> > > tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>.
>> > >
>> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Lsr mailing list
>> > > Lsr@ietf.org <mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsr mailing list
>> Lsr@ietf.org <mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to