Hi Tony，
1). It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ. IS-IS TTZ
abstracts a zone to a single node. This abstraction is supported by the
extensions to IS-IS, and some of these extensions are not defined in Area
Proxy. For example, the extensions for the edge nodes of the zone are not
defined in Area Proxy.
The details is underlined above. It says that some of the extensions in
IS-IS TTZ are not defined in Area Proxy. It seems accurate if we look at the
details.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: Tony Li <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 12:20 AM
To: Huaimo Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ
Hi Huaimo,
1). It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ.
I feel that this is somewhat imprecise.
>From my perspective, our attempts to collaborate have been hampered by
>governmental regulations that are wholly out of our control. The suggestions
>that I’ve made for continued collaboration within the bounds of those controls
>have not been well received. Thus, to say that something cannot be done is
>overstating the case. We have simply not been wiilling to do so, which is
>most unfortunate. Who can say what could happen if we could find a way for
>all three proposals to collaborate?
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
