Thomas, I have one comment/suggestion to Paragraph 4 (IANA Considerations).
Please add also a code point for BGP Prefix-SID - it’s quite popular in DC deployments. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8669 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8669> thanks, /hannes > On 28.07.2020, at 10:11, [email protected] wrote: > > Dear lsr, > > I presented the following draft > > Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information > Export (IPFIX) > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-04 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-04> > > at the spring working group at IETF 108 yesterday > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-spring-ip-flow-information-export-ipfix-00.pdf > > <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-spring-ip-flow-information-export-ipfix-00.pdf> > > and today at OPSAWG where I call for adoption. > > This draft adds additional segment routing code points for in the IANA IPFIX > registry for IS-IS, OPSFv2 and OPSF v3 and segment routing SID types to gain > further insights into the MPLS-SR forwarding-plane. > > I have been asked to not only gather feedback from spring and opsawg but also > from lsr and mpls working groups since these code points are related to link > state routing protocols and mpls data plane. > > I am looking forward to your feedback and input. > > Best Wishes > Thomas Graf > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
