Thomas,

I have one comment/suggestion to Paragraph 4 (IANA Considerations).

Please add also a code point for BGP Prefix-SID - it’s quite popular in DC 
deployments.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8669 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8669>

thanks,

/hannes

> On 28.07.2020, at 10:11, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote:
> 
> Dear lsr,
>  
> I presented the following draft
>  
> Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information 
> Export (IPFIX)
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-04 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-04>
>  
> at the spring working group at IETF 108 yesterday
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-spring-ip-flow-information-export-ipfix-00.pdf
>  
> <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-spring-ip-flow-information-export-ipfix-00.pdf>
>  
> and today at OPSAWG where I call for adoption.
>  
> This draft adds additional segment routing code points for in the IANA IPFIX 
> registry for IS-IS, OPSFv2 and OPSF v3 and segment routing SID types to gain 
> further insights into the MPLS-SR forwarding-plane.
>  
> I have been asked to not only gather feedback from spring and opsawg but also 
> from lsr and mpls working groups since these code points are related to link 
> state routing protocols and mpls data plane.
>  
> I am looking forward to your feedback and input.
>  
> Best Wishes
> Thomas Graf
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org <mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to