Hi Bruno,

> [Bruno] Agreed so far.
> Do we agree that draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy uses the SID/Label sub-TLV? 
> We both agree that this sub-TLV has no mention of the global flag nor the 
> routing algoto be used.

So far, we do NOT have agreement on that.  Your argument yesterday (backed by 
Robert) is pretty compelling: go ahead and assign a prefix and now the Area SID 
may be advertised as a Node SID in the Proxy LSP. If we take that direction, 
this discussion is moot.


Lsr mailing list

Reply via email to