Hi Les, > 1)Invent a new type of SID which is associated with an area. > In this case some variation of encodings defined in V2 of the draft are > appropriate.
But these aren’t backward compatible, which operators clearly want. > 2)Use a reachable address to get to the area. That address could be the node > address of the current Area Leader or an anycast address shared by all IERs. Either of these is fine by me. Do others care? > IN which case existing prefix SID advertisement is appropriate coupled with a > means of identifying the address. There are two proposed encodings for that. And here we haven’t come to agreement. Do others have a preference? Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
