Hi, all:
Support its adoption. >From the current contents of these two drafts, as Acee said, there are enough >differences between them. The area-proxy draft defining mainly the extension >of the TLVs that should be carried by the Proxy LSP, the TTZ draft emphasizes >mainly the smooth transition procedures and the related protocol extension. Using the protocol to solve the transition problem can certainly ease the deployment/operation overhead. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt Based on the discussions in the last meeting and on the mailing list regarding draft-chen-isis-ttz-11, the chairs feel that there are enough differences with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 and in the community to consider advancing it independently on the experimental track. These differences include abstraction at arbitrary boundaries and IS-IS extensions for smooth transition to/from zone abstraction. We are now starting an LSR WG adoption call for draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt. Please indicate your support or objection to adoption prior to Tuesday, September 2nd, 2020. Thanks, Acee and Chris
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
