A quick question: If an IP address and a Flexible Algorithm are associated with the same interface, they are also associated with one another. An IP address MAY be associated with, at most, one interface.
If multiple IP addresses and multiple flexible algorithms are associated with a loopback interface, is each IP address associated with all flexible algorithms? What matters is the association b/w an IP address and a flexalgo, so the relationship should be defined in a direct way rather than each being associated with an interface, right? Regards, Muthu On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:07 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica= 40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Please review and comment > > Ron > > > > Juniper Business Use Only > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 9:36 AM > > To: Parag Kaneriya <pkane...@juniper.net>; Shraddha Hegde > > <shrad...@juniper.net>; Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>; Rajesh M > > <mraj...@juniper.net>; William Britto A J <bwill...@juniper.net> > > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt > > > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt > > has been successfully submitted by Ron Bonica and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > Name: draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo > > Revision: 00 > > Title: IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flexalgo) In IP Networks > > Document date: 2020-09-29 > > Group: Individual Submission > > Pages: 14 > > URL: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bonica- > > lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!X7PVDP- > > FnUA0oCcZMw3Qde6in0C72hu_9hOZ53kPspIarR8fNDyU9Vck80Zbjoij$ > > Status: > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-lsr- > > ip-flexalgo/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!X7PVDP- > > FnUA0oCcZMw3Qde6in0C72hu_9hOZ53kPspIarR8fNDyU9Vck8x7e5ZqI$ > > Htmlized: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft- > > bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!X7PVDP- > > FnUA0oCcZMw3Qde6in0C72hu_9hOZ53kPspIarR8fNDyU9Vck82w_6CyU$ > > Htmlized: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft- > > bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!X7PVDP- > > FnUA0oCcZMw3Qde6in0C72hu_9hOZ53kPspIarR8fNDyU9Vck81_QrJ_p$ > > > > > > Abstract: > > An IGP Flexible Algorithm computes a constraint-based path and maps > > that path to an identifier. As currently defined, Flexalgo can only > > map the paths that it computes to Segment Routing (SR) identifiers. > > Therefore, Flexalgo cannot be deployed in the absence of SR. > > > > This document extends Flexalgo, so that it can map the paths that it > > computes to IP addresses. This allows Flexalgo to be deployed in any > > IP network, even in the absence of SR. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr