Hi Huanan, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see inline [Yali].
Please feel free let us know your thoughts. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 10:00 AM To: wangyali <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00 Hello WG and Authors, I have read the draft. It is a good idea to use IGP extension to notification the HBH ablility. Commments as follow: 1. How to enable the IGP extensions for HBH？ [Yali] The Hop-by-Hop Options header processing action TLVs defined in this draft, for example, can be enabled in IGP through configuration. 2. Does the IGP use the HBH option as criterion to genernate a new topology? [Yali] The topology are not changed and affected. Such advertisements can allow entities (e.g. centralized controllers) to exclude nodes that are not HbH-capable when paths are computed for specific services. For example, if you need a private line that must be measured by IOAM or IFIT, you can exclude nodes that are not HbH-capable during path computation for making sure performance data can be collected and exported at every HbH-capable nodes in the private line. BR. Huanan Chen From: wangyali<mailto:[email protected]> Date: 2020-10-29 21:19 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] New Version for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00 Hello WG, Considering the Hop-by-Hop Options header has been used for IOAM [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options], Alternate Marking method [I-D.ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark], etc., but as specified in RFC8200, the Hop-by-Hop Options header is only examined and processed if it is explicitly configured. In this case, nodes may be configured to ignore the Hop-by-Hop Options header, drop packets containing a Hop-by-Hop Options header, or assign packets containing a Hop-by-Hop Options header to a slow processing path. Thus, the performance measurement does not account for all links and nodes along a path. In addition, packets carrying a Hop-by-Hop Options header may be dropped, which gravely deteriorates network performance. Therefore, we propose a new draft about IGP extensions for signaling Hop-by-Hop Options header processing action at node and link granularity. Such advertisement is useful for entities (e.g., the centralized controller) to gather each router's processing action for achieving the computation of TE paths that be able to support a specific service encoded in the Hop-by-Hop Options header. Please let us know your opinion. Questions and comments are very welcome. Best regards, Yali -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 8:42 PM To: Tianran Zhou <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Huzhibo <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; wangyali <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Yali Wang and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process Revision: 00 Title: IGP Extensions for Advertising Hop-by-Hop Options Header Processing Action Document date: 2020-10-29 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 10 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00 Abstract: This document extends Node and Link attribute TLVs to Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) to advertise the Hop-by-Hop Options header processing action and supported services (e.g. IOAM Trace Option and Alternate Marking) at node and link granularity. Such advertisements allow entities (e.g., centralized controllers) to determine whether the Hop-by-Hop Options header and specific services can be supported in a given network. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
