Hi Jie,
> But if node A sends SRv6 packets with node C's SRv6 SID in FA 128 as the > destination address, when the packet arrives at E, it will be dropped, > because node E does not have the forwarding entry for C's SRv6 SID in FA > 128. * How can E be on the SRv6 SID list if it did not advertise SRv6 participation in the first place ? * What do you mean by "SRv6 SID in FA 128" ? Aren't SIDs global and not per FA ? Btw this is good discussion but how is this related to IP Flex Algo topic/draft ? Last - I do share your concern on how topology computation can be data plane independent. Yes it works for IP Flex Algo when IPv4 and IPv6 are topologically congruent, but when you add running SR on subset of nodes to the mix it is no longer the case. Thx, R.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
