Hi Rob,
On 4/5/21, 9:41 AM, "Robert Wilton via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote:
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for this.
Not a comment that requires addressing in the text, but considering section
5
on the operational impact: Is there an OSPF YANG model that is being
updated
to cover any additional configuration required to enable this functionality
on
a subset of prefixes, and/or are any changes to the operational YANG data
model
required to express the prefix source?
Yes - we will add an augmentation in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-yang-augmentation-v1/
Thanks,
Acee
Regards,
Rob
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
