Hi Acee, Great. Thank you for confirming.
Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> > Sent: 05 April 2021 14:46 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- > originator-10: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Rob, > > On 4/5/21, 9:41 AM, "Robert Wilton via Datatracker" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-10: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- > originator/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for this. > > Not a comment that requires addressing in the text, but considering > section 5 > on the operational impact: Is there an OSPF YANG model that is being > updated > to cover any additional configuration required to enable this > functionality on > a subset of prefixes, and/or are any changes to the operational YANG > data model > required to express the prefix source? > > Yes - we will add an augmentation in > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-yang-augmentation-v1/ > > Thanks, > Acee > > Regards, > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
