I support WG adoption as this draft helps maintain feature parity as close as possible between OSPF and ISIS.
Great job on the continuing effort to maintaining IGP feature parity by WG and chairs. This is very important for operators. ISIS MI RFC 8202 OSPFv3 AF RFC 5838 ISIS Advertise Generic Information RFC 6824 OSPFv2 OSPFv3 transport instance - this draft As Robert mentioned and I think others agree that there is some parity that can be extended from IGP to EGP. Kind Regards Gyan On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 4:47 AM Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-instance/ > > Please indicate your support or objection by May 16th, 2021. > > Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of > any IPR that applies to this draft. > > Historical Note: The original OSPF transport instance document was adopted > by the OSPF WG back in 2009, it was last updated in 2014, and then revived > as an individual submission to LSR in Sep 2020. :) > > Thanks, > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
