Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ section 9 ] * I share the concerns of several of the others here about SRv6 SIDs being claimed to be IPv6 addresses but kinda not really being IPv6 addresses if their internal structure is exposed outside of the given SR router. If "[i]t's usage is outside of the scope of this document", can this be removed for now, and maybe take up the issue at some point in the future by which time a motivating use case might have presented itself? _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
