Hi Erik,
I have posted a new version of the draft that clarifies the usage of the
ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV and lists some of the use cases.
thanks,
Peter
On 19/05/2021 03:58, Erik Kline via Datatracker wrote:
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[ section 9 ]
* I share the concerns of several of the others here about SRv6 SIDs being
claimed to be IPv6 addresses but kinda not really being IPv6 addresses
if their internal structure is exposed outside of the given SR router.
If "[i]t's usage is outside of the scope of this document", can this be
removed for now, and maybe take up the issue at some point in the future
by which time a motivating use case might have presented itself?
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
